Mid. Tenn. State
Men -
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
236 |
Hillary Rono |
SO |
32:23 |
473 |
Geoffry Cheruiyot |
SO |
32:56 |
512 |
Eliud Rutto |
JR |
33:00 |
715 |
Amos Cheruiyot |
SO |
33:22 |
971 |
Kigen Chemadi |
FR |
33:44 |
1,121 |
Alden Dixon |
SR |
33:57 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
19.7% |
Top 10 in Regional |
97.8% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Hillary Rono |
Geoffry Cheruiyot |
Eliud Rutto |
Amos Cheruiyot |
Kigen Chemadi |
Alden Dixon |
UTC Frontrunner Invitational |
10/17 |
1116 |
32:59 |
|
33:02 |
34:31 |
33:05 |
34:36 |
Conference USA Championships |
10/31 |
1019 |
32:34 |
32:47 |
32:53 |
33:18 |
33:24 |
33:50 |
South Region Championships |
11/13 |
1007 |
32:07 |
33:10 |
33:09 |
33:09 |
34:49 |
33:54 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
28.5 |
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
6.9 |
203 |
|
0.0 |
1.3 |
4.8 |
13.5 |
25.0 |
21.4 |
16.4 |
10.8 |
4.6 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hillary Rono |
19.8% |
154.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geoffry Cheruiyot |
0.2% |
196.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliud Rutto |
0.1% |
197.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amos Cheruiyot |
0.0% |
168.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kigen Chemadi |
0.0% |
209.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alden Dixon |
0.0% |
241.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Hillary Rono |
12.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
1.1 |
2.7 |
3.9 |
5.0 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
6.5 |
5.8 |
5.4 |
4.7 |
5.3 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
2.7 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
Geoffry Cheruiyot |
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
4.1 |
3.4 |
3.1 |
Eliud Rutto |
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
Amos Cheruiyot |
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
Kigen Chemadi |
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
Alden Dixon |
78.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
1.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
3 |
4 |
4.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
13.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
25.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
21.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
16.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
4.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
1.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
North Texas |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |